Risk-Taking vs Restriction : Pandemic Fatigue sets in (Authored by Tali Feinberg)

Risk-Taking vs Restriction : Pandemic Fatigue sets in (Authored by Tali Feinberg)

While most people understand the dangers of taking risks during the COVID-19 pandemic, many  are throwing caution to the wind. What are the psychological reasons for this, and how can we enforce stricter codes of conduct?
“People are fatigued. They are tired, bored, and stuck, and it’s hard to stay in a state of anticipatory anxiety” says Judith Ancer, a clinical psychologist in practice in Johannesburg. “Worse, there’s little clarity about the size of the issue and what’s really happening.”
“Just like people choose not to wear seatbelts or have safe sex even though they know there is evidence that this can protect them, in this case, it’s also very hard to effect behavioural change. Our capacity for denial means that people feel it won’t happen to them.”
In addition, people are suspicious of the motives of leaders, and, “If you don’t trust, you don’t listen. For young people in particular, we know that the brains of teens and young adults are primed to value reward over risk. So they go for the ‘reward’ of partying, seeing people, and feeling normal, even if it puts them or others at risk,” says Ancer. However she notes that it’s not only young people who are taking risks – people in all age groups are doing so, even those middle aged and older.
Ancer surmises that it would be difficult to enforce another hard lockdown in South Africa, “unless bodies were piling up and intensive-care units were full. In the absence of a ‘great catastrophic event’, people are just too cynical. We essentially don’t operate on facts, but on emotion and fear.”
Live, but Let Live 
While the virus is expected to be in our lives for an extended period, “There is some psychological value in learning to live with it rather than cloistering ourselves. This means to live sensibly, take precautions, and not give in to peer pressure.”
She has heard people say they were at gatherings where no one was wearing a mask, so they removed their own, even if it made them feel uncomfortable – and they did it to make others comfortable. “You shouldn’t have to apologise for keeping safe and keeping your loved ones safe. Just like not getting into a car with a drunk driver, people need to have the courage to speak up, do what’s right, and not be shamed or seen as neurotic and paranoid.”
Finally, Ancer notes that, “It’s hard and painful to imagine risk. We all need a level of ‘healthy denial’, otherwise we will be paralysed by fear that disaster is around the next corner. It’s a natural human instinct that gets us through.”
Dr Shana Saffer, a Johannesburg psychiatrist, agrees with Ancer that “there are two huge motivators responsible for people behaving as they do: fear and denial. Fear of death and contamination motivate people to act with caution. Denial encourages people to act callously or impulsively. If you introduce other motivators, such as scientific evidence and trust in people who supposedly have the knowledge and experience, it leads to an ‘informed’ decision-making strategy rather than more impulsive behaviour.
What is Adaptation
“As with any serious threat, when the trigger is witnessed and tangible, one tends to treat it with appropriate caution,” she says.
“When people don’t see or feel danger, their behaviour changes accordingly. But even with a serious threat still around, it’s still possible to start to behave less cautiously. We adapt to a situation that has no end in sight.”
According to her, this adaption is a “neuropsychological behavioural response. On a basic level, it can be explained with smell – when one enters a place with an extremely displeasing smell, the instinct is to run away. But if one is forced to stay, after a while one doesn’t notice the
stench, and isn’t affronted by it. “This is because we undergo a biological mechanism called ‘down regulation’. Basically the ‘severity’ of the environmental threat becomes ‘downplayed’ en route to the brain because it’s something that’s not going away. There is less urgency required, and the central nervous system is informed of this.”
Saffer points out that being on high alert has caused secondary medical and mental-health issues. “The incidence of suicide attempts has risen threefold in certain studies. Added to the decreased ease of releasing tension through usual methods – like gym, sport, and socialising – ultimately the tendency is to adapt.”
Psychologically, what would motivate people to be more careful at this stage?
 “It depends where one is personally in consciousness and belief, and whether the ‘ask’ is in line with or contrary to ‘group psychology’,” says Saffer.   “On an individual level, actions are reinforced when they lead to either positive outcomes or avoidance of punishment. This is basic ‘reward’ psychology – even lab rats easily learn to push a lever for a treat, or to avoid an electric shock.”
She therefore suggests using incentives as a way to enforce compliance. This is something that communities or families could take on, and is a positive way of ensuring long-term behavioural change as the pandemic continues with no end in sight.
Otherwise, a punishment of sorts could work effectively, if it’s enforced by those in authority. “When one can break rules with no consequence, there’s zero incentive for most people to follow,” she says.
Morality?
A moral or ethical appeal doesn’t always work because of what is known as Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, which shows that people must have their most basic needs met before considering ethical obligations. So, if people are concerned about having enough money to keep a roof over their heads and food on their table, they are unlikely to care about changing their behaviour for the sake of others.There are, of course, many who are being vigilant for the greater good, and many who don’t want others to suffer the way that they or their families have suffered.
But, “Even in a society where basic survival isn’t an issue, how many people recycle over concern for future generations? How many put community or common interest before themselves and their immediate reward, or even consider a personal future reward over a present desire?” asks Saffer rhetorically.
“It comes down to different levels of personal consciousness. For the most part, people are law- abiding or socially responsible and will abide by rules. Essentially, people find their own internal compass of what works for them individually, and what is socially acceptable in their community.”
Free – BEST Antidepressant in a Recession 

Free – BEST Antidepressant in a Recession 

 

“If you feel bad – do something for someone else and you will feel good “

I’ve seen this listed in many self help manuals . 

I do accept this from a neuroscience basis – there’s probably an oxytocin secretion and a slight endorphin rush , and if it’s a planned gift involving anticipatory – related reward, a touch of dopamine too. 

But what if you can’t?? Sometimes it’s easy to be a giver or supporter or nurturer of others.

Othertimes, it just isn’t. If one is unwell , physically or mentally , it can be extraordinarily difficult to focus on anything outside ones own pain, discomfort or distress. 

Esther Jungreis, a Holocaust survivor who became an American religious leader, recounts this  story , which hits a pure-truth chord every time I recount it…..

There was a very rich guy who owned a Texas based oil company . His son grew up and joined the firm . One year there was a terrible recession that hit the world. The son half-joked “ Gee dad , things are so tight now. We could really use the $300 000  that the business donated to charity last year” . 

The dad turned to his son.” Dont you know?” he said, “All that we have is that which we give? I only wish, that when i had the chance, I had given more”. 

Sometimes it can be very difficult to give.

Especially in a recession . But this Texas dude could well be right. 

Why wait till its hard ?

ReStorying Wellbeing- a webinar

ReStorying Wellbeing- a webinar

“If you asked me, I’d say normality is either a four- sided triangle or square circle”.
So said Thomas Szasz, an American psychiatrist who wrote “ the myth of mental illness”.

Circle and Square’s Dave Stevens led our hour long discussion. He explained that  “ out of the box “, or divergent thinking ( ⭕️ circle), enhances our creativity, and therein , our success.

He demonstrated with a question. “What’s the word that comes to mind if I say the word BLUE”- most people apparently respond with “ sky, sea , ocean “
I don’t think he expected the obvious answer from a doctor… “Viagra”.
The webinar emphasises themes of “ mindfulness “, and trusting ones own body . We need to embrace a return to nature, to  the openness of the wondrous child (the circle), from the jaded, overanalysed, conforming adult
( the square).
The way to wellbeing is fueled by a touch of creativity, an allowance and a tolerance for what may feel like non conformity.
Turns out – Dave is proved right by ancient geometers.  To take the openness and potential out of a persons world …. is actually described as an illness by Greek mathematicians. ‘ Morbus Cyclometricus’ is the ‘circle squaring disease’, where one can go nuts trying to figure out how to create a square with the exact surface area of an existing circle, using restricted tools.
It can’t be done. Don’t try . It’s clearly even geometrically best to “ let the circle remain a circle”.
Our take home message :
  • stay attuned to your needs
  • listen to your body
  •  reduce pressure to fill your time with work or activity .

Stay open in your thinking , be creative, and encourage such in your children . Shut them up , if you must – but never shut them down .

https://www.gotostage.com/channel/b066010ef76045b696bc7761b253fb52/recording/96114fda681f4f47bd0f5a69bbbea85e/watch
More on Mindfulness : “Wherever you go – at least get halfway there “

More on Mindfulness : “Wherever you go – at least get halfway there “

 

 

An old Zen proverb  says , “ Wherever you go, there you are”.

 

 This statement may sound obvious, but it’s profound . We humans have the ability to “ think ourselves “ anywhere. We have a capacity to choose where to direct our attention. And if we can’t, we can easily  learn this skill. 

This is the basis of Mindfulness.

A focused choice, putting attention into the present moment.So many people are scared of meditating. We know how difficult it is to clear our minds . But mindfulness practice merely asks that you focus on observing your thought , watching them dance around your head. The thing is not to have any commentary or judgement about the content of such thoughts – just to be aware of them.

You don’t have to sit on the floor to meditate. Mindfulness meditation can be practiced anywhere in any position, as long as the mind is brought to the present moment – to be aware, alert and non – judgemental toward ourselves and towards others.

 

 

 Remember the advice “ take a deep breath “? 

It remains one of the most instant mood  changers and method of calming. It’s free, it’s instantly available and it gets oxygen to your brain.

In fact , with three conscious breaths we can release the tensions in our body and mind and return to a cool and calm state of presence. That’s all it takes. Three unhurried breaths. No Rush. 

 

 

Why should we practice mindfulness ? 

 

It sounds easy enough to do, but it really should be practised, daily . It’s like exercising a muscle. 

 With practice and perseverance, the idea is that we can change the basic beat of our neural rhythm  in a positive way.

 This reduces constant stimulation of regions of the brain that cause unpleasant feelings of anxiety. 

 That’s a good reason to practice, but there’s more. The benefit becomes recursive.

 Without the burden of anxiety, a person naturally becomes more mindful in their daily lives. They become  less forgetful, because they are paying more attention.  They report being generally happier with greater levels of satisfaction.  

 

Mindfulness in clinical Medicine 

 

Jon Kabat-Zinn, PhD, the MIT graduate who brought the practice of mindfulness to medicine, entitled one of his books “ Wherever you go, there you are”.

Dr Kabat- Zinn is the founder of the MBSR program ( mindfulness based stress reduction ) which has evidence –  based clinical benefit in all sorts of chronic medical illnesses. This practice also boosts the immune system . 

Mindfulness – based Cognitive Therapy ( MBCT) is used as an effective treatment for depression as well as prevention of relapse. 

 

How do I start?

 

Many of you are doing it already 

Did you know that many religious practices are designed to help focus attention and awareness on a moment.   

As an  example, grace before meals, or blessing the foods we eat, requires us to take a moment to immerse ourselves wholly in an aspect of the present. We sanctify the moment. 

 

 

 

If you play a sport such as golf, you’re doing it as you focus on your next swing. Total attention is placed on the present. If you cannot attend in such a manner you won’t be a very good golfer. 

 So,  I’d guess that many of you are already halfway there. I have just invented my own saying:  wherever you go, at least get halfway there. Because by then, the effort it takes to give up and go home is the same as that required to persevere.

 My advice on the easiest way to start mindfulness meditation is by following a simple practice of observing your breath. 

 As you get more comfortable with this practice, you can begin to consciously modify your breathing . 

 

I really find the 4-7-8 breath very easy and useful. Dr Andrew Weil, a Harvard graduate and practitioner of integrative medicine in Arizona, details the method . 

 Breathe in through your nose , counting to 4. Hold the breath in to a count of 7. Then open your lips and slowly and powerfully exhale to a count of 8. Repeat at least four times. I encourage you to give it a try .

 

As Confucius said – wherever you go, go with all your heart.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                        Meet Dr Andrew Weil :The 4-7-8 Breath